nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent IPv6
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 13:14:09 -0400
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:50 AM, ML <ml () kenweb org> wrote:
I guess someone with a >1 Gb commit in a not so small city deserves to be charged extra for a few Mbps of IPv6... For a not so full table at that.
We canceled some 10GbE Cogent circuits because of Cogent's refusal to provision IPv6 without adding extra fees, and I expressed my reasoning well in advance of canceling the first one. I have been told that they have now eliminated the special fee for North American customers, but just two weeks ago I heard about this IPv6 surcharge stupidity still being applied to Cogent's customers in Europe. If you want to change your vendor, sometimes you have to change your vendor. -- Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz> Sr Network Operator / Innovative Network Concepts
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Owen DeLong (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Xiaoliang Zhao (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Tom Hill (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Jun 09)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 Dennis Burgess (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeroen Wunnink (Jun 10)