nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent IPv6
From: ML <ml () kenweb org>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:39:22 -0400
On 6/8/2011 9:51 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a Gig with them, So they don't do that dual peering thing with us. (They do it on another 100Mb/s circuit we have... I despise it.) Just kind of curious how they go about it. Do they issue you a small IPv6 block for your interface, just like they do for IPv4? Is it a separate session? Any things to be aware of before pulling the trigger on it? (Other then them not having connectivity to HE's IPv6 side of things, Wish they would fix that already...) Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
Did Cogent have the gumption to charge you more for IPv6 too?
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Nick Hilliard (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Owen DeLong (Jun 10)
- Re: IPv6 routing protocols Xiaoliang Zhao (Jun 10)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Tom Hill (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Jun 09)
- RE: Cogent IPv6 Dennis Burgess (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeroen Wunnink (Jun 10)