nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cogent IPv6

From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:39:42 +0100

On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 23:39 -0400, ML wrote:

Did Cogent have the gumption to charge you more for IPv6 too?


We have a bit of transit from them (~20Mbit or so) to stay connected to
their customers.

Getting IPv6 setup was really simple. No extra charges. It's been easier
than via our existing L3 reseller (Adapt).

Tom

Current thread:

Re: IPv6 routing protocols, (continued)
- - - Re: IPv6 routing protocols Nick Hilliard (Jun 10)
    - Re: IPv6 routing protocols Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 10)
    - Re: IPv6 routing protocols Owen DeLong (Jun 10)
    - Re: IPv6 routing protocols Xiaoliang Zhao (Jun 10)
    - Re: Cogent IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 09)
    - Re: Cogent IPv6 Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
    - Re: Cogent IPv6 Ray Soucy (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Chris Russell (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 Ask Bjørn Hansen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 08)
  - Re: Cogent IPv6 Tom Hill (Jun 09)
    - Re: Cogent IPv6 ML (Jun 09)
    - Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeff Wheeler (Jun 09)
    - RE: Cogent IPv6 Dennis Burgess (Jun 09)
    - Re: Cogent IPv6 Jeroen Wunnink (Jun 10)