nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol)
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:49:14 +1000
In message <B53BEF53-F327-44ED-8F23-A85042E99B3F () delong com>, Owen DeLong write s:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:=20 In message <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106060732190.68892 () goat gigo com>, Jason =Fesler writes:But anyway, just consider it: a portion of the major websites go IPv6-only for 24 hours. What happens is that well, 99% of the =populacecan't reach them anymore, as the known ones are down, they start =callingand thus overloading the helpdesks of their ISPs.=20 Won't happen this year or next. Too much money at stake for the web=20=sites. Only when IPv4 is single digits or less could this be even=20 remotely considered. Even the 0.05% hit for a day was controverial =at=20$dayjob.=20 IPv4 will never reach those figures. IPv6 isn't preferenced enough =forthat to happen and IPv6-only sites have methods of reaching IPv4 only sites (DS-Lite, NAT64/DNS64).I think you'll be surprised over time. Given the tendency of the = internet to nearly double in size every 2 years or so, it only takes 7 cycles = (about 15 years) for the existing network to become a single-digit percentage of the future network. Owen
And without there being a strong IPv6 bias in the clients they will continue to use IPv4/IPv6 on a 50/50 basis. I would be quite happy to be proven wrong and only time will tell. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol), (continued)
- Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jeroen Massar (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jason Fesler (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Mark Andrews (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Matthew Petach (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jérôme Nicolle (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Jérôme Nicolle (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Joly MacFie (Jun 07)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Mark Andrews (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Mark Andrews (Jun 06)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Owen DeLong (Jun 07)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Dale W. Carder (Jun 07)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Mark Andrews (Jun 07)
- Re: Why no IPv6-only day (Was: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol) Neil Harris (Jun 07)
- Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day) Jeroen van Aart (Jun 06)
- Re: Protocol-41 is not the only tunneling protocol (Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day) Owen DeLong (Jun 06)
- RE: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day Frank Bulk (Jun 03)