nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Dave Pooser <dave.nanog () alfordmedia com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:29:59 -0600
On 1/12/11 1:03 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> wrote:
NATing IPv6 doesn't do anything good. There's no benefit, only cost.
Except for making sure you can switch providers without renumbering, which can be a significant benefit. (Yes, PI space accomplishes the same thing, but that's harder to get for most SMBs.) -- Dave Pooser, ACSA Manager of Information Services Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com
Current thread:
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?, (continued)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jim Gettys (Jan 15)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Mark Smith (Jan 16)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jim Gettys (Jan 16)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Lamar Owen (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Dave Pooser (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 12)
- RE: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 12)