nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:19:10 -0600
On 1/6/2011 12:26 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
A bunch of very smart people have worked on IPv6 for a very long time, and justification for /64's was hashed out at extended length over the period of years.
NDP should have been better designed. It still has the same problems we had with ARP except the address pool has magnified it.
Routers should have 1) better methods for keeping ND tables low (and maintaining only valid entries) or 2) better methods for learning valid entries than unsolicited NDP requests.
This isn't to say the protocol itself is a waste, but it should have taken in the concerns and developed the mitigation controls necessary as recommendations to the implementers.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document William Allen Simpson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joel Jaeggli (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Marcel Plug (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)