Re: NIST IPv6 document

[Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:

> On 1/5/11 10:36 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> >
> > > A bunch of very smart people have worked on IPv6 for a very long
> > > time, and justification for /64's was hashed out at extended
> > > length over the period of years.
> >
> > Very smart people can and do come up with bad ideas, and IPv6 is a
> > textbook example of this phenomenon, heh.  I certainly bear my share
> > of the responsibility for this state of affairs by not getting
> > involved, and leaving the heavy lifting to others.
>
> The reason for standing on the shoulders of giants should not be to piss
> on them.

I sense an unnecessary level of acrimony here.

No one is pissing on the work done by the many folks who have spent many
years hashing out v6 work.

But I think you are missing a larger point -- much of the security
community has been summarily dismissed in its concerns along the way.

$.02,

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFNJXTUq1pz9mNUZTMRAs9BAKDh1N+BJFgmbROPSIOf+rM5v+Ol1ACbBfcr
qXiMOvfkjLtTaQX55I+Sc2U=
=aFv3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/