nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 23:46:06 -0800
On 1/5/11 10:36 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Joe Greco wrote:A bunch of very smart people have worked on IPv6 for a very long time, and justification for /64's was hashed out at extended length over the period of years.Very smart people can and do come up with bad ideas, and IPv6 is a textbook example of this phenomenon, heh. I certainly bear my share of the responsibility for this state of affairs by not getting involved, and leaving the heavy lifting to others.
The reason for standing on the shoulders of giants should not be to piss on them.
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document William Allen Simpson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joel Jaeggli (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Marcel Plug (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)