nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
From: Andree Toonk <andree+nanog () toonk nl>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:55:28 -0800
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at 11-01-31 12:11 PM Christopher Morrow wrote:
I understand this is by design, but I can imagine some operators will be reluctant to actually drop routes when they start testing RPKI deployments in their networks.yes, but what is the way forward?
Not sure, that was my original question: Are there any suggestions or recommendations for how to handle these cases?
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Dongting Yu (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Alex Band (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Arturo Servin (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jared Mauch (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Martin Millnert (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database ML (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 30)