nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
From: ML <ml () kenweb org>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:30:47 -0500
On 1/30/2011 4:53 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
I think it is too early in the deployment process to start dropping routes based on RPKI alone. We'll get there at some point, I guess.Do we really *want* to get to that point?I thought that was the point and the goal of securing the routing infrastructure is laudable. But the voices in my head say don't trust them with control of your routes, see what happened in Egypt. brandon
I would hope the response to the USG pressuring ARIN to diddle the RPKI db would be disabling of RPKI queries by most BGP speakers.
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jared Mauch (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Martin Millnert (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database ML (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Martin Millnert (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Carlos M. Martinez (Jan 31)