nanog mailing list archives

Re: Level 3's IRR Database

From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:17:35 -0600

On 1/31/2011 12:40 PM, Dongting Yu wrote:

Would it be classified as invalid or unknown? Or are both possible
depending on whether 208.65.153.0/24 is signed? Do these two cases
differ in this particular case?

Based on the draft it is invalid, as the shorter covering prefix issigned, so the longer prefix will inherit that signing but not be valid.



Jack

Current thread:

Re: Level 3's IRR Database, (continued)
- - - Message not available
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 30)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Dongting Yu (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Alex Band (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Arturo Servin (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jared Mauch (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
    - Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)

(Thread continues...)