nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:22:41 -0200
Hi, this is the second mention I see of RPKI and Egypt in the same context. I sincerely fail to see the connection between both situations. Egypt cut their links the old fashioned way: they pulled the plug. I fail to see how such a situation could be made worse by RPKI. It simply has nothing to do. Not deploying RPKI won't prevent your local friendly autocrat from ordering "cut all wires" or something like that. regards Carlos On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk> wrote:
I think it is too early in the deployment process to start dropping routes based on RPKI alone. We'll get there at some point, I guess.Do we really *want* to get to that point?I thought that was the point and the goal of securing the routing infrastructure is laudable. But the voices in my head say don't trust them with control of your routes, see what happened in Egypt. brandon
-- -- ========================= Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo http://www.labs.lacnic.net =========================
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Martin Millnert (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database ML (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Martin Millnert (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Carlos M. Martinez (Jan 31)