Re: What's the current state of major access networks in North America ipv6 delivery status?

[Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlos () lacnic net>]

I guess I won't need to add routes to my gateway, only subnetting on the
inside will probably do for the time being (a hub/spoke topology,
routing only between directly-connected subnets). And many ISPs allow
you to buy your own CPE.

Using an AirPort Extreme (or other home router with similar features)
in bridged mode would do the trick, i guess.

:-)

cheers,

Carlos


On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Antonio Querubin <tony () lava net> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:
>
> > Reading this thread, and building on many comments to a previous one,
> > I definitely see the need for subnetting a /64 arising sooner than
> > later.
> >
> > It might not be perfect, It might be ugly, but it will happen. And, if
> > you ask me, I would rather subnet a /64 than end up with a ipv6
> > version of NAT, a much worse alternative.
>
> Maybe not NAT but some kind of proxy ND and/or a migration from routing
> firewalls to bridging firewalls.  If the broadband provider is only
> providing a single /64, it's not likely they're gonna be willing to add
> routes to your gateway.
>
> Antonio Querubin
> e-mail/xmpp:  tony () lava net