nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:09:54 +1100


In message <WHKMjz3PUzSNFAcx () perry co uk>, Roland Perry writes:
In article <20110203220604.A8BAE9A5102 () drugs dv isc org>, Mark Andrews 
<marka () isc org> writes

In any event, two of my applications are not IPv6 compatible, and would
require significant upgrading. And will my ADSL provider and my 3G
provider both switch to IPv6 at about the same time?

You shouldn't have to care.  Properly written clients will connect
over whatever is available without significant delay and since you
are multi-homed

I'd call it more alternate-homed.

you really do want your clients to be properly written.  If they are 
not complain to your vendor as they are not meeting the RFC 1123 
requirements.

One client is no longer maintained (but I am very attached to it). The 
other is nailed inside a five-year-old VoIP box and I suspect they'll 
say "buy a new one".

These are just my straw poll of what may be difficult for small 
enterprises in a change to IPv6.

It isn't "change to", its "add IPv6".

I expect to see IPv4 used for years inside homes and enterprises
where there is enough IPv4 addresses to meet the internal needs.
It's external communication which needs to switch to IPv6.  Internal
communication just comes along for the ride.

Mark

-- 
Roland Perry

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: