nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 22:21:05 +0000
On 02/02/2011 21:26, Matt Addison wrote:
RA Guard has been described in RFC 6105 (still draft, but standards track), so that particular problem should be taken care of once vendors start shipping code. It doesn't even require SeND- although it does accomodate it.
wonderful. In the interim, it is sheer lunacy to enable ipv6 on a large flat network if you can't synthesise ra guard with ipv6 packet filters.
yes, there are some switches out there which do it already. They are very much in the minority.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Daniel Hagerty (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Seth Mattinen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... John Payne (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... John Payne (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Leo Bicknell (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Matt Addison (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... George Herbert (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)