nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Matt Addison <matt.addison () lists evilgeni us>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:26:53 -0500
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 16:13, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
I love this question, because it basically admits the protocol is broken. To make RA's even remotely palitable, you need "RA Guard" on the switches. This feature does not exist, but if we bring features like DHCP guard forward into the IPv6 world, it's the logical solution and solves the problem.
RA Guard has been described in RFC 6105 (still draft, but standards track), so that particular problem should be taken care of once vendors start shipping code. It doesn't even require SeND- although it does accomodate it. ~Matt
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Matt Addison (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Daniel Hagerty (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Seth Mattinen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... John Payne (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... John Payne (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Leo Bicknell (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Matt Addison (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... George Herbert (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Owen (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Owen (Feb 02)