nanog mailing list archives
RE: ipv4's last graph
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf () tndh net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:11:48 -0800
-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Hoffman [mailto:jhary () unsane co uk] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:44 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ipv4's last graph On 02/02/2011 17:22, Matthew Petach wrote:On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf () tndh net> wrote:So in the interest of 'second opinions never hurt', and I just can'tget myhead around "APnic sitting at 3 /8's, burning 2.3 /8's in the last 2monthsand the idea of a 50% probability that their exhaustion event occursAug.2011", here are a couple other graphs to consider. http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools.pdf http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools-zoom.pdf TonyTwo things: 1) you'll get better uptake of your graph if it's visible as a simple image, rather than requiring a PDF download. :/Not wishing to advertise google but http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4- rir-pools.pdf and http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4- rir-pools-zoom.pdf works for me without needing to download a pdf viewer
For some reason that viewer didn't work here, so I added jpg's to the site. http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools.jpg http://www.tndh.net/~tony/ietf/IPv4-rir-pools-zoom.jpg
Vince2) labelling the Y axis would help; I'm not sure what the scale of 1-8 represents, unless it's perhaps the number of slices of pizza consumed per staff member per address allocation request?
I thought about leaving it off completely, but figured I would be asked for scale. It is /8's remaining until they drop into their 'last allocation' policy. I will see if I can figure out how to fit that into something readable.
But I do agree with what seems to be your driving message, which is that Geoff could potentially be considered "optimistic". ^_^;
Geoff has always been the optimist ... ;0
Matt
Current thread:
- Re: ipv4's last graph, (continued)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Geoff Huston (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Mark Smith (Feb 04)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Mark Townsley (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Rubens Kuhl (Feb 01)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Tore Anderson (Feb 02)
- RE: ipv4's last graph Tony Hain (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Matthew Petach (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Vincent Hoffman (Feb 02)
- RE: ipv4's last graph Tony Hain (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Ken Chase (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Richard Barnes (Feb 02)
- RE: ipv4's last graph Tony Hain (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: ipv4's last graph Randy Bush (Feb 01)