nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...


From: "George Bonser" <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:00:26 -0800



I am 100% pro making Class E defined as private unicast space.

My only point is that people need to be realistic about the near term
benefit.  Yes, some linux may work.  But, Microsoft and Cisco don't
work today.  Let's move it to not-reserved, but don't bet the farm on
240/4 solving any of your problems or in any way changing the need to
for IPv6 migration.  This is where the slipperly slope and expectation
settings start.

Cameron

Considering the amount of linux-based CPE and other network hardware out
there (including some Cisco gear), the extent to which it might be
usable today could be surprising.




Current thread: