nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:01:21 -0200
I think the ship has sailed for the class E /8s. Using them will require significant effort and that effort, both time and money, is better spent on deploying IPv6. regards Carlos On 2/1/11 9:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:43 PM, George Bonser wrote:3. Busting out 16 more /8s only delays the IPv4 endgame by about a year. jmsIf used for general assignment, sure. But if used for what people have been begging for NAT444 middle-4 space. Well, that might work. Code update on the CPE is all it would take. The systems involved would never see it.If they could do code updates on the CPE, then, they could use RFC-1918. The problem is that code-updating that much CPE is, well, impractical to say the least. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jimmy Hess (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jimmy Hess (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nicholas Suan (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nicholas Suan (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Carlos M. Martinez (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jared Mauch (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Tony Finch (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Jimmy Hess (Feb 02)