nanog mailing list archives
Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: Tom Limoncelli <tal () whatexit org>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:44:21 -0500
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu> wrote:
What we really need is a new method of sending data. The fact that I will never be able to send something from Maine to California in less than 15 ms is not acceptable. The speed of light is such a drag.
I propose that everyone on this mailing list make it their #1 New Years Resolution to fix this problem. If we all work together, we can do something about it! Tom -- http://EverythingSysadmin.com -- my blog http://www.TomOnTime.com -- my videos
Current thread:
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!, (continued)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Aiden Sullivan (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vadim Antonov (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Robert Bonomi (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Joe Hamelin (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Limoncelli (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jared Mauch (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! David Barak (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Darius Jahandarie (Dec 29)