nanog mailing list archives
Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:11:24 +0900
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP! Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!
atm-2, aka mpls
Current thread:
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!, (continued)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vadim Antonov (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Robert Bonomi (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Joe Hamelin (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Limoncelli (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jared Mauch (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! David Barak (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Darius Jahandarie (Dec 29)