nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy.
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:57:31 -0800
--- Bryan () bryanfields net wrote: From: Bryan Fields <Bryan () bryanfields net> Now this gets a lot more fun as we get closer to true IPv4 exhaustion. If there is a business case between two or more providers to side step a RIR process and recognize IP allocations that the RIR does not, who really has the power to stop them? -------------------------------------------------- The networking community in general. The usefulness of the space would be very limited. scott
Current thread:
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy., (continued)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Cameron Byrne (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Leo Bicknell (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Ricky Beam (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Brielle Bruns (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Cameron Byrne (Dec 16)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. David Conrad (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Justin M. Streiner (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Bryan Fields (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. David Conrad (Dec 15)