Re: IPv6 end user addressing

[james machado <hvgeekwtrvl () gmail com>]

> It isn't hard to do some arithmetic and guess that if every household
> in the world had IPv6 connectivity from a relatively low-density
> service like the above example, we would still only burn through about
> 3% of the IPv6 address space on end-users (nothing said about server
> farms, etc. here) but what does bother me is that the typical end-user
> today has one, single IP address; and now we will be issuing them 2^16
> subnets; yet it is not too hard to imagine a future where the global
> IPv6 address pool becomes constrained due to service-provider
> inefficiency.

what is the life expectancy of IPv6?  It won't live forever and we
can't reasonably expect it too.  I understand we don't want run out of
addresses in the next 10-40 years but what about 100? 200? 300?

We will run out and our decedents will go through re-numbering again.
The question becomes what is the life expectancy of IPv6 and does the
allocation plan make a reasonable attempt to run out of addresses
around the end of the expected life of IPv6.


> Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz>
> Sr Network Operator  /  Innovative Network Concepts

james