nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN Fraud Reporting Form ... Don't waste your time


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:03:56 -0700


On Oct 1, 2010, at 2:27 PM, George Bonser wrote:



-----Original Message-----
From: Ricky Beam 
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 1:00 PM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: ARIN Fraud Reporting Form ... Don't waste your time

On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:45:10 -0400, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
wrote:
It's not so much a matter of whether ARIN cares or whether ARIN
wants
to do something about your issue. It's more a matter of whether ARIN
is empowered to do anything at all about your issue.

EXACTLY.

Ron, what exactly do you expect ARIN to do?  Where is the magic wand
one
would wave to erase routes from the internet?  ARIN (in fact NO ONE)
has
no actual means to block or recend any route announcement.  Do you
suggest
they sue whomever is involved?  That won't be very fast, or even an
option
outside the US.


The problem as I see it is that ARIN is responsible for issuing number
resources but is not responsible for any maintenance of the number
space.  It seems they have no requirement/method/need to revoke
assignments once the assigned entity no longer exists.  I am not looking

They do, indeed, for space that is/was issued by ARIN. That space is
subject to annual fees and there is a clear and consistent method
for doing so. The bigger problem is with legacy space (most of the
space listed in the complaint we are discussing, if not all).

In the case of legacy space, it's actually very hard for ARIN to even
identify the status of the organization in question, let alone take
any sort of action with respect to said space.

for perfection but there should be some sort of diligence requirement
that the most obvious of the low hanging fruit (or fruit that falls
right off the tree into their lap) be dealt with in some way.  If an
entity liquidates, then their resources should be reclaimed.  

Again, for space issued by ARIN, yes. For legacy space, this is a much
more complicated problem.

The good news is that this is limited to IPv4. Since there are no Pre-RIR
IPv6 allocations or assignments, it is a non-issue in IPv6.

How many entities does ARIN have who have not made a payment for 2 or
more consecutive years but still have resources assigned?  It is my

I suspect not many. (Unless you are including those organizations
that do not pay fees because of their legacy status).

Owen



Current thread: