nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:27:57 -0500
On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:17 PM, William Herrin wrote:
And doesn't Moore's Law mean that 18 months from now it should cost half as much?
Maybe for the parts that are electrical, but for the parts that are optical, they may have a longer span. Also, not everyone swaps out those electrical parts every 18 months, business life-cycles typically dictate years. You don't replace your car stereo every 18 months (or maybe YOU do, but we're talking about the average consumer)... The issue here is cost of infrastructure. The last mile generally is more valuable than the long-distance part. Everyone can build a nationwide network for a nominal amount of money. All the carriers can provide circuits at the same IXPs where you can public/private peer. The question does become, who is in those smaller and mid-markets. Not everyone is going to build fiber in Akron, Eugene, nor Madison. It gets even more interesting if you look at what happened with Fairpoint in the northeast IMHO. Verizon realized they would not make money there and sold it off. The promises and costs consumed them and forced bankruptcy. I'm not saying that will happen to Comcast, but it may cause them to divest the unprofitable parts as well, leaving some parts of the country worse-off than we would be today. - Jared (these are my personal opinions, and not those of any employers current, past nor future)
Current thread:
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions, (continued)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Ben Butler (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions David Reader (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Michael Painter (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions William Herrin (Nov 29)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Ben Butler (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Michael Painter (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Joly MacFie (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Joly MacFie (Nov 30)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Jared Mauch (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Andrew Koch (Nov 29)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions George Bonser (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Christopher Morrow (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 29)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions George Bonser (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement ConcerningComcast'sActions Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast'sActions Cameron Byrne (Nov 30)