nanog mailing list archives

Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:51:09 -0500

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:34:52 PST, Seth Mattinen said:

My take on this is that settlement free peering only remains free as
long as it is beneficial to both sides, i.e. equal amounts of traffic
exchanged.

Equal *value* of traffic exchanged.  A network that has a lot of eyeballs
may be willing to accept some imbalance to connect to a popular source
of content, and that content source is equally motivated to cut some
slack on the ratio to get good access to more eyeballs.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: