nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:31:50 +0100
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 22:17, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
Bit, nibble and /64 then. /64 is treated specially by functions in the protocol (like SLAAC) thus it's a protocol boundary rather than a social one (/12 IANA allocations, /32 ISP allocations, /48 end-user assignments).
I would argue that /0 and /128 are somewhat special, too.
Unless you particularly feel the need to assign /64's to router loopbacks, you'll see plenty of routes longer than /64 in your table too.
That's a personal preference, really. Unless you mess up, or are an end user permanently stuck with a /64 (in which case your ISP messed up), there isn't really much need to assign anything longer, though. That being said, for whatever reason, several of my upstreams use /126 for their sessions. In any case, other than "some people might see the colons as magic markers" I don't really see an argument in favour of avoiding a common name. And that does not seem to hold much water. This is not meant to be an attack, I simply wonder if I am missing something. Richard
Current thread:
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming, (continued)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Michael Dillon (Nov 26)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Frank Habicht (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Jay Nugent (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Frank Habicht (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Herrin (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Herrin (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Herrin (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Herrin (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 22)