nanog mailing list archives

Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:17:16 -0500

On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> wrote:
On 11/19/10 12:45 PM, William Herrin wrote:
The meaningful boundaries in the protocol itself are nibble and /64.
If you want socially significant boundaries, add /12, /32 and /48.

It is possible and desirable to be able to describe any mask length
between /0 and /128. the /64 is an important demarcation point for
subnets but everything shorter than that will appear in your routing table.

Hi Joel,

Bit, nibble and /64 then. /64 is treated specially by functions in the
protocol (like SLAAC) thus it's a protocol boundary rather than a
social one (/12 IANA allocations, /32 ISP allocations, /48 end-user
assignments).

Unless you particularly feel the need to assign /64's to router
loopbacks, you'll see plenty of routes longer than /64 in your table
too.

Regards,
Bill Herrin




-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside comĀ  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: