nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 rDNS
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:22:36 -0400
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:21:14 -0000, Sven Olaf Kamphuis said:
getting rid of bind has various other advantages, such as no longer needing tcp to transfer "zone files" (Retarded concept to say the least) so there are no more "tcp issues" related to anycasting your authorative dns servers, as you can simply have them talk to your central database over their bgp session ip, which isn't anycasted, no more port 53/tcp therefore! yay, good riddance!
Till the first time you have to answer a query that's over 512 bytes that doesn't have the EDNS0 bit set... Yes, such beasts still live out there.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 rDNS Lee Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS David Freedman (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS David Freedman (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Leo Bicknell (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Curtis Maurand (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Lamar Owen (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Crist Clark (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS David Freedman (Nov 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Michel de Nostredame (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Mark Andrews (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Mark Andrews (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Mark Andrews (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 rDNS Owen DeLong (Nov 01)