nanog mailing list archives
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
From: Franck Martin <franck () genius com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
APNIC allows you to put your BGP data in the whois, so like this you have a third party verification tool on who is peering with who.
Current thread:
- Securing the BGP or controlling it? Franck Martin (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Scott Howard (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Franck Martin (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Thomas Magill (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Zaid Ali (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Hank Nussbacher (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Scott Howard (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Aaron Glenn (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Joe Abley (May 10)