nanog mailing list archives
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
From: Scott Howard <scott () doc net au>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 21:17:00 -0700
Made it to Slashdot too - http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/05/10/0056228/The-Status-of-Routing-Reform-mdash-How-Fragile-is-the-Internet As usual I wouldn't recommend reading the comments unless you want your eyes to bleed... Scott. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Franck Martin <franck () genius com> wrote:
http://skunkpost.com/news.sp?newsId=2327
Current thread:
- Securing the BGP or controlling it? Franck Martin (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Scott Howard (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Franck Martin (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Thomas Magill (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Zaid Ali (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Hank Nussbacher (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Scott Howard (May 09)