nanog mailing list archives
Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:37:31 -0400
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net> wrote:
They filter my routes. Not sure what he's talking about.
just guessing but they probably don't filter 'peer' (SFP) routes, so if say 2914 accepted a route from their customer ConEdison that included a subnet of yours... boom goes your reachability :(
Current thread:
- Securing the BGP or controlling it? Franck Martin (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Scott Howard (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Larry Sheldon (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Randy Bush (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Franck Martin (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Thomas Magill (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Zaid Ali (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? deleskie (May 10)
- RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Hank Nussbacher (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Christopher Morrow (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Scott Howard (May 09)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Aaron Glenn (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Jared Mauch (May 10)
- Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it? Nick Hilliard (May 10)