nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alaska IXP?
From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder () wisc edu>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:00:09 -0600
On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Jay Hanke wrote:
From the looks of the link it looks like there is a bit of traction at theMadIX. One of the other interested carriers has talked to the University of MN and they showed some interest in participating. The trick is getting the first couple of participants to get to critical mass. Is the MadIX using a route server or is it strictly layer2?
Just L2 w/ PIM snooping. Dale
Current thread:
- Re: Alaska IXP?, (continued)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Sean Donelan (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Jared Mauch (Mar 04)
- RE: Alaska IXP? Jay Hanke (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Andrew Hoyos (Mar 04)
- RE: Alaska IXP? Jay Hanke (Mar 04)
- RE: Alaska IXP? Aaron Wendel (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Jared Mauch (Mar 04)
- Small IXP [was Alaska IXP?] Jay Hanke (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Scott Howard (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Sean Donelan (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Dale W. Carder (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Mr. James W. Laferriere (Mar 03)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Joe Abley (Mar 04)
- Re: Alaska IXP? Marty Anstey (Mar 04)