nanog mailing list archives
Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:30:16 +0800
On Mar 3, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Leen Besselink wrote:
Not comparing this to the former-DDR or Chinese situation (please refer to my tin-foil remark above) a per-country specific prefix is not necessarily a bad thing and may even have an upside.Care to explain what that could possibly be? (I simply don't see an upside to making it easy to censor the internet by national identity).Maintenance of "GeoIP"-databases becomes easier and less error-prone ?
Um, you say that like it's a good thing.
Possible less out of date because of it.
True.
We've seen complaints about those many times on this list.
Yes, geolocation by IP is a fundamentally broken idea and process. That's, frankly, a good thing in my opinion. However, ignoring all of that for a moment, what makes you assume that CIRs would only delegate prefixes within their own nation under this scheme? I suspect several countries will likely be happy to sell or rent address space to the highest bidder. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd), (continued)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Antonio Querubin (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Kevin Oberman (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) David Conrad (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Ron Broersma (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Owen DeLong (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Leen Besselink (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Richard Barnes (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Leen Besselink (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Leen Besselink (Mar 02)