nanog mailing list archives
Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:25:31 -0500
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:42:15 +0100, Arjan van der Oest said:
(considering the fact that governments themselves are not capable of running anything but a gray-cheese-with-a-dial telephone networkHm, I was under the impression that ARPANET was a government run network...
I would not be surprised if some of the bigger providers now have bigger networks in their test labs than the ARPANET/MILNET combo was - ISTR it was on the order of 4,000 total nodes in the 1984 era. I remember being surprised when my then-current employer joined both networks that the 3,000+ nodes on Bitnet and the size of the Arpa/Mil aggregate being comparable (and Bitnet may have been even bigger at some points). And let's face it - the Arpa/Milnet was a test network, not a production network.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd), (continued)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Adam Waite (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Larry Sheldon (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Larry Sheldon (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Joel Jaeggli (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Larry Sheldon (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Owen DeLong (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Antonio Querubin (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Kevin Oberman (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Adam Waite (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) David Conrad (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Ron Broersma (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Owen DeLong (Mar 01)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Leen Besselink (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Richard Barnes (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Leen Besselink (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Owen DeLong (Mar 02)
- Re: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd) Leen Besselink (Mar 02)