nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alcatel-Lucent
From: piotr sawicki <piotr.sawicki.pl () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:03:36 +0100
The worst thing in it was bgp proto .. Router was unable to withstand 20+ peering sessions , most of that outgoing bgp session to customers , a few peerings , and only 1v2 incoming upstream providers When there was instability/surge in bgp updates , router was able to break itself tcp sess. Dwnld bgp table (150,000prefix) took 2h or more ... Things done in hardware should be working although ( bridge .. , maybe label switching , vpls ) Tech support is very weak. Expect problems with interoperability . Sorry to say that . It was 3+ years time ago , maybe they improved themself .. :)
Hi, I must say we had very old timos 2.0R17 , as you now use 8.0 I guess ..As most of my complains is against software , this may be improved - i hope it is :)
Hardware is solid, 'hard to kill' Sorry for a bit preliminary assumptions about 7750SR platform . // regards PiotrSawicki.
Current thread:
- Alcatel-Lucent Chris Wallace (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Dan Snyder (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Jo Rhett (Mar 06)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent piotr sawicki (Mar 08)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent piotr sawicki (Mar 09)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Phil Bedard (Mar 09)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent piotr sawicki (Mar 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Scott Weeks (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Craig (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Chadwick Sorrell (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Craig (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Scott Weeks (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Scott Weeks (Mar 04)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent Scott Weeks (Mar 06)