nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?"
From: msokolov () ivan Harhan ORG (Michael Sokolov)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:28:40 GMT
Kevin Oberman <oberman () es net> wrote:
And, if you are using a 1988 TCP stack on a 4.3 system, you are not likely to ever efficiently utilize a higher speed link
What higher speed link? I'm very happy with 384 kbps symmetric, using SDSL as ARPANET replacement. I have designed and built my own SDSL to EIA-530 CSU/DSU so I can use a Cisco 2500 router instead of that nasty new-fangled Netopia which has (oh horror!) RJ45 Ethernet instead of proper AUI. Oh, did I forget to mention that my Ethernet is coaxial? To me all that UTP stuff isn't true Ethernet.
and will not behave well on any link. TCP has come a long way in the past 12 years. (Of course, I can't guess what "mostly unchanged" means.)
Backward compatibility rules! MS
Current thread:
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?", (continued)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" joel jaeggli (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Stefan (Mar 29)
- RE: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Dylan Ebner (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Steve Meuse (Mar 26)
- RE: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Olsen, Jason (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Jared Mauch (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Frank A. Coluccio (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Frank A. Coluccio (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Michael Sokolov (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Kevin Oberman (Mar 29)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Michael Sokolov (Mar 29)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 30)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" joel jaeggli (Mar 26)