nanog mailing list archives

Re: Auto MDI/MDI-X + conference rooms + bored == loop


From: John Kristoff <jtk () cymru com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:07:44 -0500

On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:09:22 -0400
Chuck Anderson <cra () WPI EDU> wrote:

Anyone have suggestions on Ethernet LAN loop-prevention?  With the 
advent of Auto MDI/MDI-X ports on switches, it seems way too easy to 
accidentally or maliciously create loops between network jacks.  We 

Some time ago I did some work on implementing what cisco called 'port
security'.  The idea was to add some layer 2 protection from a security
perspective.  It turns out in practice, at least in the environment I
was in, they never happen.  However, it did offer protection for loops
since if a secured port saw a source address show up another another
port, it would block it and generate logs, which we monitored and could
then go deal with while the network remained up.

There are some potential gotchas depending on how you implement port
security so you need consider carefully how you implement it if you do
it.  Its been awhile since I've done anything in this space, but this
better captures my experience since my memory of it is beginning to
fade:

  <http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/opsec/opsec.2005/msg00033.html>

John


Current thread: