nanog mailing list archives
Re: Looking for comments
From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 13:43:25 +0930
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:18:39 +0100 Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 23/07/2010 01:17, Mark Smith wrote:Does this qualify? What the customer sees is delivered over IPv6, unlike the CPE management problem, where the ISP is the "IPv6 customer". "IPv6: The Future of IPTV? In Japan it isn't the future, it's now." http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3795086/IPv6-The-Future-of-IPTV.htmI understand that there are several networks doing this; the STB - like the CPE modem - is managed by the service provider and the customer has no management / control access over it. The customer stays on ipv4 for their regular access product. Someone offline pointed me at the Google IPv6 Implementors 2010 conference, at which:https://sites.google.com/site/ipv6implementors/2010/agenda/13_Byrne_T-Mobile_IPv6GoogleMeeting.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1This is genuinely interesting.
Certainly is. I've generally classified mobile operators as people who are heavily on the side of walled gardens. It's refreshing to see one advocating e2e and global reachability.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Looking for comments, (continued)
- Re: Looking for comments Owen DeLong (Jul 21)
- Re: Looking for comments Franck Martin (Jul 21)
- Re: Looking for comments William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments Owen DeLong (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments William Herrin (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments Brian E Carpenter (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments Nick Hilliard (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments Mark Smith (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments Franck Martin (Jul 22)
- Re: Looking for comments Nick Hilliard (Jul 23)
- Re: Looking for comments Mark Smith (Jul 23)
- Re: Looking for comments William Herrin (Jul 23)
- RE: Looking for comments Lee Howard (Jul 23)