Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links

[Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>]

On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:04:26 +0000
"Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:

> On Jan 24, 2010, at 4:43 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> > That's a new bit of FUD. References?
>
> It isn't 'FUD'.
>
> redistribute connected.

In my opinion it's better not to do blind redistribution. More control
means less things that are unexpected or or can be forgotten.

That being said, I don't understand why that's a problem, and why that
problem doesn't already exist in IPv4. 

> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
>     Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
>
>                         -- H.L. Mencken