nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:56:23 +0100 (CET)
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, Mathias Seiler wrote:
So what do you think? Good? Bad? Ugly? /127 ? ;)
This thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/20788 had a long discussion regarding this topic. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mathias Seiler (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mark Smith (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Dobbins, Roland (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links James Hess (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links David Freedman (Jan 25)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 23)
- Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links Christopher Morrow (Jan 23)