nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:06:22 -0600
On 2/19/2010 12:53 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
So you should think that its ok for blacklists to charge money for things they got for free?
Well, in the interest of staying on topic..... I don't think Spamhaus is selling the data (as you spammers in do do). So far as I know, the data are supplied by volunteers and voluntary offerings of victims of spam. What the charge is for is to support the high-volume capable servers and data links required to support commercial enterprises (like Barracuda) who make money off of those data. Somebody who actually knows what they are talking about can correct my errors for me. People in the gored-ox group can remain silent. -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- RE: Spamhaus..., (continued)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Paul Vixie (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus... Steven Champeon (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Marc Powell (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... Graeme Fowler (Feb 21)