nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:45:35 -0500
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:57:31 GMT, Paul Vixie said:
Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> writes:We're well past that. Every minimally-competent postmaster on this planet knows that clause became operationally obsolete years ago [1], and has configured their mail systems to always reject, never bounce. [2]for smtp, i agree. yet, uucp and other non-smtp last miles are not dead.
In exactly the same sense, and for the same reasons, that 36-bit machines are not dead yet.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus..., (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 24)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 24)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Paul Vixie (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus... Steven Champeon (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Marc Powell (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 20)