Re: How polluted is 1/8?

[Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>]

If it's not obvious, I've thoguht about this and made some offers to the people at APNIC/RIPE.

Hoping someone moves forward with this.

The note was on the apops list (iirc).

- jared

On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Tico wrote:

> On 2/4/10 2:14 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > I know someone who'd happily sink both the /24's in question.. if apnic's
> > interested.
> >   
> Ditto.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Jared Mauch<jared () puck nether net>  wrote:
> >
> >   
> > > On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
> > >
> > >     
> > > > Mirjam Kuehne wrote:
> > > >       
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > After 1/8 was allocated to APNIC last week, the RIPE NCC did some
> > > > >         
> > > measurements to find out how "polluted" this block really is.
> > >     
> > > > > See some surprising results on RIPE Labs:
> > > > >         
> > > http://labs.ripe.net/content/pollution-18
> > >     
> > > > > Please also note the call for feedback at the bottom of the article.
> > > > >         
> > > > The most surprising thing in that report was that someone has an AMS-IX
> > > > port at just 10 megs.  It would be nice to see an actual measurement of
> > > > the traffic and daily/weekly changes. A breakdown of the flow data by
> > > > source ASN and source prefix (for the top 50-100 sources) would also be
> > > > interesting.
> > > >       
> > > There was a call on the apnic list for someone to sink some of the traffic.
> > >
> > > I'd like to see someone capture the data and post pcaps/netflow analysis,
> > > and possibly just run a http server on that /24 so people can test if their
> > > network is broken.
> > >
> > > I've taken a peek at the traffic, and I don't think it's 100's of megs, but
> > > without a global view who knows.
> > >
> > > - Jared
> > >
> > >