nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 24, Issue 129


From: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski () cable comcast com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:39:04 -0500

We will have follow up interactions that should help determine expertise
levels.  We want to make sure that our recruiting efforts do not
unnecessarily exclude people.  Overtime we need to make sure our trials
include people with varying degrees of expertise.

John


On 1/28/10 7:00 AM, "nanog-request () nanog org" <nanog-request () nanog org>
wrote:

Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:07:16 -0600
From: "Tony Varriale" <tvarriale () comcast net>
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
To: <nanog () nanog org>
Message-ID: <03F9DCFCAB174CE8AB2B69D429AFF70B@flamdt01>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Jason Brzozowski" <john_brzozowski () cable comcast com>
To: "Steven Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>
Cc: <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials


Thanks.

Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target trial subscribers
with greater IPv6 awareness.  The technical team will absolutely remain
engaged as part of the support process.

HTH,

John

I filled out the form but nowhere on there does it allow to brag up or
differentiate yourself from the typical home user (or select which trial(s)
you may be interested in).

It appears the differentiators are your PC OS, gaming platform and if you
have more than 1 IP.

tv

=========================================
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
e) mailto:john_brzozowski () cable comcast com
o) 609-377-6594
m) 484-962-0060
w) http://www.comcast6.net
=========================================



Current thread: