nanog mailing list archives
Re: [Operational] Internet Police
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:48:41 -0800
On 12/10/10 9:06 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:08:00 EST, Lamar Owen said: I believe the word you wanted was "hooliganism". And we have a legal system that has about 3,000 years of experience in dealing with *that*, thank you very much.
The code of hamurabi or ur-nammu would probably cut off your hand or require the payment of several minas of silver. The failure isn't one of the legal system not having the tools to prosecute this sort of activity, it's the failure to effectively police it. Other attractive nusances the cause economic damage such as graffiti and antisocial behavior(of which much of this dos activity clearly is) have been around longer than the code of ur-nammu and we haven't solved them yet either.
Current thread:
- RE: [Operational] Internet Police, (continued)
- RE: [Operational] Internet Police George Bonser (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Paul Graydon (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jack Bates (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police JC Dill (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Michael Smith (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Lamar Owen (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jack Bates (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Jack Bates (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Joel Jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police isabel dias (Dec 11)
- Re: [Operational] Internet Police Chris Adams (Dec 09)