Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked

[Brett Watson <brett () the-watsons org>]

On Dec 1, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> sometimes I love to pull your chain... :) I agree though that folks
> won't publish this data (in general) directly, for whatever reason.
> Also, right '15% of traffic' really should have been '15% of routes*'

Agreed, I should have been more clear. I wasn't implying that much traffic either, but rather "15% of global prefixes."

I was more focused on, "Seems clear enough that traffic *transited* China ASNs, as opposed to being blackholed as we 
seen in many hijacks.

Further, in hopes of generating discussion... I've seen a lot of comments along the lines of "this was likely an 
accident, misconfiguration, or fat-finger..."

I'm having a really hard time figuring how, if traffic not only diverted to China but *transited* China, this could be 
any kind of mistake. I'm not able to get my fingers or thumbs to randomly (seemingly) select approximately 15% of all 
prefixes, originate those, modify filters so I can do so, and also somehow divert it to another router that doesn't 
have the hijacked prefixes I'm announcing but rather forwards the source traffic on to it's intended destination.

I can't seem to work all of that out into any kind of "accident."

Anyone?

-b