nanog mailing list archives
Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 18:17:26 -0500
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
<conspiracy-hat>also, you won't get the traffic stats from the offending parties</conspiracy-hat>and how much traffic data does google publish? or iij or ntt? oops! cho, fukuda, esaki, & kato [0] did show real traffic data from japan's largest isps. no accusations meant. just trying to keep the discussion near sea level.
sometimes I love to pull your chain... :) I agree though that folks won't publish this data (in general) directly, for whatever reason. Also, right '15% of traffic' really should have been '15% of routes*' -chris (*) routes as seen in one set of perspectives... not valid in tennessee, wyoming, parts of Alabama, Albania, Germany, The ex-UK-protectorates or...
Current thread:
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Marshall Eubanks (Dec 01)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Christopher Morrow (Dec 01)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Randy Bush (Dec 01)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Christopher Morrow (Dec 01)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Brett Watson (Dec 01)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked James Hess (Dec 02)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Jeremy L. Gaddis (Dec 02)
- Re: FUD: 15% of world's internet traffic hijacked Randy Bush (Dec 01)