nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
From: "Elliott, Andrew" <AElliott () xo com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:55:12 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm () rollernet us] Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 8:37 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons On 12/21/10 2:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from public route-view servers. AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%) Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%) GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%) Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%) Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%) TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%) Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)
Sprint (AS1239) is sending 3,779 routes. XO Communications (AS2828) is sending 3973 prefixes.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 21)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jeff Wheeler (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Bjoern A. Zeeb (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Pekka Savola (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Jared Mauch (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Owen DeLong (Dec 22)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Seth Mattinen (Dec 23)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Scott Taylor (Dec 23)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Joel Jaeggli (Dec 23)
- RE: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Elliott, Andrew (Dec 24)
- Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons Mike Tancsa (Dec 25)