nanog mailing list archives

Re: end-user ipv6 deployment and concerns about privacy


From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:41:56 -0500

Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
the other one will be dynamically allocated. I have no clue how the
user would switch between these subnets (without using some kind of
command line tools).

Web portals work fine, and honestly, it's not like you need to switch subnets, either. PPPoE/A implementations work great, as they are already designed to utilize radius backends to quickly alter static/dynamic on a session. For bridging setups, you have a variety of implementations and it becomes messier. Cisco, while maintaining RBE did away with the concept of proxy-nd, and didn't provide a mechanism for dynamically allocating the prefixes to the unnumbered interface. If you use dslam level controls, you'll most likely being using DHCPv6 TA addressing with PD on top of it, which works well. Most of which can support quick static/dynamic capabilities as it does with v4.


Jack


Current thread: